Election Nerve CentreGhanaHeadlineLegalNews

Election 2020 petition: Mahama begs Supreme Court to correct another mistake

Mahama is seeking to amend a review, filed on 20 January 2021, challenging the dismissal of his application to serve interrogatories on the EC

Lawyers for the former president John Dramani Mahama have filed yet another process at the Supreme Court seeking the courts permission to amend another mistake – this time, on the grounds of the review they filed on 20 January 2021, challenging the dismissal of their application to serve interrogatories on the Electoral Commission (EC).

According to the latest application, dated 25 January 2021 and signed by Tony Lithur, the solicitor for the petitioner, Mahama is praying the court for an order, granting him leave to “file and/or argue an additional ground for his application for review filed on 20 January 2021, replace paragraph 28 of the original statement of case and to file a supplement to the statement of case”.

Original motion

The initial motion, for a review of the Supreme Court ruling on the dismissed application to serve interrogatories on the Electoral Commission, is dated 19 January 2021.

It is paragraph 28 of this motion that Mahama seeks to correct, stating that there is no reference whatsoever in Rule 69(C)(4) of Cl 99 to amendments.

It is rather Rule 69A (6) that provides as follows: “The respondents to the petition shall not amend an answer to the petition so as to add unto or alter the answer to the filed petition.”

“In the clear terms of this provision, it is not the case that amendments ought not to be sought or granted. The provision is limited to the respondents to the petition and is also very clearly qualified. Only in so far as the attempt to amend seeks to ‘amend an answer to the petition so as to add unto or alter the answer to the filled petition’ is there a bar to amendment.

“The fundamental legal errors of this passage in the ruling are compounded: a) Rule 69(CX4) of Cl 99 has nothing to do with amendments, b) the bar to amendments is limited to respondents attempting to amend an answer to the further, and c) only amendments which seek to add unto or alter an answer to the filed petition” are disallowed and not all amendments.”

Amendment requested to petition

In papers for the new process he has filed as the petitioner, John Mahama says he wishes to correct paragraph 28 as follows: “The original statement of case, filed on 20 January 2021, is hereby amended by the substitution of paragraph 28 with the following:

“There is no reference whatsoever in Rule 69(C)(4) of Cl 99 to amendments. It is rather Rule 68(7) and Rule 69A (6) which provide, respectively, as follows:

“68(7) ‘A petitioner shall not amend a petition so as to add unto or alter the grounds of petition as stated in the filed petition.’

“69A(6) ‘The respondents to the petition shall not amend an answer to the petition so as to add unto or alter the answer to the filed petition.’

“In the clear terms of these provisions, it is not the case that amendments ought not to be sought or granted. The provisions are limited and are very clearly qualified. In respect of the petitioner, an amendment sought by him is prohibited only to the extent that such an amendment seeks to add unto or alter the grounds of petition. Other kinds of amendment may be sought or granted.

“Similarly, in respect of the respondents, an amendment sought by any of them is prohibited only to the extent that such an amendment seeks to add unto or alter the answer to the filed petition.”

“Other kinds of amendment may be sought or granted.

“The fundamental legal errors that the ruling of My Lords contain[s] are compounded by two factors, namely: (a) Rule 69(CX4) of Cl 99 has nothing to do with amendments; and (b) only amendments which seek to add unto or alter the grounds of the petition or the answer to it are disallowed, and not all amendments as My Lords held.”

Read the application for amendment of the motion below:

Petitioner’s Application for Amendment of Review Application and for Leave to File Supplement to Statement of Case

Court sits again 26 January

The seven-member Supreme Court panel, presided over by Chief Justice Kwasi Anin-Yeboah, is expected to resume sitting on the election petition tomorrow, Tuesday 26 January 2021.

Sittings resume amid multiple applications, which the court must hear before it deals with the substantive petition before the court.

Wilberforce Asare / Asaase News

Asaase Radio 99.5 – tune in or log on to broadcasts online
Follow us on Twitter: @asaaseradio995
#asaaseradio  #TVOL

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

ALLOW OUR ADS